Jennifer Lawrence is in charge of feeding it and working it out and making it cry on cue and deciding when and where and for whom it takes its clothes off. Jennifer Lawrence controls and propels it and makes it say funny things to Jack Nicholson at awards shows. It has not escaped my notice that her body is very beautiful.īut, here's the other thing about Jennifer Lawrence's body: It has Jennifer Lawrence living inside it.
I understand the desire to see Jennifer Lawrence naked, I really do. And, it's not just sociopaths who act like women's bodies are unoccupied public land - it's anyone who considers this a "leak" and not a theft, who considers the photos to be something to look at, not evidence of a crime. What the woman wants is irrelevant her anger and shame and sadness might even add savor in some cases. They believe they have a controlling interest in it. Does their right to see boobs, by any means necessary, outweigh a woman's ownership of her own body, her own lived experience, and yes, her right to take and share photos with her partner or lover without risking them "going viral? Those who share or view a woman's - or anyone's - nude photo against her will, whether she's a celebrity or someone's ex-girlfriend, do so because they believe themselves to be a stockholder in that body.
It's odd that hackers - so vocal about NSA spying and other invasions of privacy - have no problem with this form of stealing personal information. What lies behind this marketplace for illicit, illegal, invasive photos? Basically, it seems that some men forget, ignore, or are never taught in the first place that there are real living creatures inside women's pretty exteriors. On Sunday, it was clear his price had been met he or they? You may have heard about this happening. Last week, an anonymous 4chan user boasted that, if paid sufficient money and Bitcoin, he would supply nude photos of dozens of female celebrities. Skip navigation! Story from Entertainment News.
0 kommentar(er)
